phoenyxoftheashes:

zeezeepearl:

dawnpop:

robotsandfrippary:

wildstrawberryjelly:

whitenoiseblackknight:

elusivemellifluence:

betatheblackfox:

andthosearesmalleragents:

gem-femme:

eroticcannibal:

ahumanbeing00:

bloodytales:

Ready for some prime bullshit?

That’s right folks. Unnatural hair colors means women are crazy.

Unless, just hear me out on this… it could be that some women like pretty hair colors.

Or they trying to avoid these type of idiots.

Go women with unnatural hair.

As I saw pointed out in a tweet in response to this weak analogy:

In nature, these things occur as a defence from predators.

We dye our hair wild colors so assholes like this stay far away from us lmao.

TOXIC T H O T T E R Y

He sounds like someone from the 1800s what the actual fuck

Unnatural hair colours impress a lot of other women (especially queer ones), entrance small children, and put off men like this. Win/win/win

This is actually the reason I give when asked why my hair is bright pink. It’s a threat display.

Stay away young kings

You know, I get honest compliments from guys now, just, “Wow your hair looks awesome!” and that’s it.  No more, “Hey baby~” or “Smile, honey” or “BOOBS.” 

Just “Your hair looks cool!” 

Can’t fuckin wait to dye my hair M A N H A T E R B L U E

Reblogging for toxic thottery

I laughed at “stay away young Kings” and “toxic thottery”. Lmfao

diversehighfantasy:

Another ding on r/saltierthancrait.

This thread, which included responses from marginalized fans, was locked because people were posting about TLJ’s sexism and racism – banned topics in what many see as a safe place to be openly critical of the film.

FYI, it’s not.

This is not a new thing for the Star Wars fandom. The longtime forum The Jedi Council has a zero tolerance policy against racist posts (good!) which has led to locked threads because someone called out other posts on the forum as racist (not good).

A TLJ critical sub that doesn’t allow discussions about racism and sexism is not one that allows open criticism. It’s their perogative to do that, but I thought yall should know in case you post there.

Anyway, I wrote a response, but it didn’t post because the thread was locked while I was typing it. Here it is:

“I am a Black woman who blogs a lot about representation and race in media. I’ve been called a SJW many times.

I was very disappointed in TLJ. I’ve tried to see the good in how it handled Finn, but it’s like, you have to make an effort to see any positives. That’s not good representation. I think the movie gave the finger to racial diversity by centering Kylo so much and leaving so much of Finn’s arc on the cutting room floor. Don’t even get me started on RJ calling Kylo and Rey co-protagonists after Rey and Finn were the clear co-protagonists in TFA.

Finn had his own arc that had parallel’s to Rey’s arc, but it’s pretty clear RJ only really cared about the Rey/Kylo arc. Unlike most people, I think the Rey/Kylo scenes were the worst part of the film. I don’t care about Kylo’s entitled tears. I don’t think he’s a bad villain in theory – the angry young man from a good family who sees himself as the victim is relevant for our time. RJ seemed more interested in making him “complex,” but there’s nothing complex (or progressive) about making the white villain “the real protagonist” and the Black co-protag secondary.

I also found Rey’s arc, especially making her up like Bugs Bunny in lipstick in an old Looney Toons cartoon to “woo” Kylo to the light, sexist. (I’m very pro makeup BTW, but considering she just came from a cave in the middle of nowhere that was just insulting.)

It blows my mind tbh that people think most fans who didn’t like TLJ are mad because it’s too diverse and feminist.“

(You’ve probably heard me say all if this before if you’re a follower, but damn if I was going to let it go unposted).

dick-graysons-left-butt-cheek:

murderxbaby:

notanadult:

amuseoffyre:

aggrokawaii:

justsomeantifas:

my-username-is-classified:

justsomeantifas:

call me ignorant but i genuinely don’t understand why sports have to be split up by gender.

@ everyone in the notes talking about physical performance: if that were the case, then sports would be divided by physical performance. that’s a thing you can measure. that’s a thing that varies by individual. a weak man and a strong man would be an unfair fight in boxing/wrestling/MMA, which is why they divide those sports up into weight groups based on physical performance. but they also further segregate them based on gender. chess is segregated by gender for no reason but sexism. if it’s actually about skill and physical ability, then measure those and separate people by those metrics. don’t do some bullshit gender segregation and pretend like men and women are inherently on different levels no matter their individual abilities.

💅

Remember that time a teenage girl struck out Babe Ruth? That’s fucking why. Men are afraid of being beaten by women.

Remember that time male swimmers were pulled out of training because Kate Ledecky was leaving them ‘broken’ by swimming better than them? Remember how she didn’t even notice, because she was busy actually training?

Shooting is a sport that has no reliance on strength and so any allowance for gender variation is irrelevant.

The last time there was a mixed competition (1992) a chinese woman named Zhang Shan won it.

It’s often presented as for the benefit of women. After all, they’ll be heartbroken when they‘re hurt or bested by men.

Projection is a hell of a drug. 

doubletranquility:

remember how anita sarkeesian, some online nobody, made a few videos about how sexism is bad so she got death threats and her entire career ruined by gamers?  But then that wasnt enough for them and since they thought real life was like halo they somehow became convinced that she was like this big all powerful overlord with a fuck ton of social and political power who was literally gonna censor all video games and they drew fanart of this with vivian james as like some lone rebel or something and they suddenly had all these conspiracy theories about her embezzling money or controlling the industry and they legitimately believed a hoax that she was involved in the development of mirrors edge 2 and was gonna “make the game easier for women“ but she was just someone making videos and then all this publicity they gave her resulted in her being asked to speak for like, 5 minutes at the united nations just to talk about internet harassment and they all legitimately believed she was gonna somehow convince the UN to instill fascism

We’re Ready

shannonhale:

I was presenting an assembly for kids grades 3-8 while on book tour for the third PRINCESS ACADEMY book.

Me: “So many teachers have told me the same thing. They say, ‘When I told my students we were reading a book called PRINCESS ACADEMY, the girls said—’”

I gesture to the kids and wait. They anticipate what I’m expecting, and in unison, the girls scream, “YAY!”

Me: “’And the boys said—”

I gesture and wait. The boys know just what to do. They always do, no matter their age or the state they live in.

In unison, the boys shout, “BOOOOO!”

Me: “And then the teachers tell me that after reading the book, the boys like it as much or sometimes even more than the girls do.”

Audible gasp. They weren’t expecting that.

Me: “So it’s not the story itself boys don’t like, it’s what?”
The kids shout, “The name! The title!”

Me: “And why don’t they like the title?”

As usual, kids call out, “Princess!”

But this time, a smallish 3rd grade boy on the first row, who I find out later is named Logan, shouts at me, “Because it’s GIRLY!”

The way Logan said “girly"…so much hatred from someone so small. So much distain. This is my 200-300th assembly, I’ve asked these same questions dozens of times with the same answers, but the way he says “girly” literally makes me take a step back. I am briefly speechless, chilled by his hostility.

Then I pull it together and continue as I usually do.

“Boys, I have to ask you a question. Why are you so afraid of princesses? Did a princess steal your dog? Did a princess kidnap your parents? Does a princess live under your bed and sneak out at night to try to suck your eyeballs out of your skull?”

The kids laugh and shout “No!” and laugh some more. We talk about how girls get to read any book they want but some people try to tell boys that they can only read half the books. I say that this isn’t fair. I can see that they’re thinking about it in their own way.

But little Logan is skeptical. He’s sure he knows why boys won’t read a book about a princess. Because a princess is a girl—a girl to the extreme. And girls are bad. Shameful. A boy should be embarrassed to read a book about a girl. To care about a girl. To empathize with a girl.

Where did Logan learn that? What does believing that do to him? And how will that belief affect all the girls and women he will deal with for the rest of his life?

At the end of my presentation, I read aloud the first few chapters of THE PRINCESS IN BLACK. After, Logan was the only boy who stayed behind while I signed books. He didn’t have a book for me to sign, he had a question, but he didn’t want to ask me in front of others. He waited till everyone but a couple of adults had left. Then, trembling with nervousness, he whispered in my ear, “Do you have a copy of that black princess book?”

He wanted to know what happened next in her story. But he was ashamed to want to know.

Who did this to him? How will this affect how he feels about himself? How will this affect how he treats fellow humans his entire life?

We already know that misogyny is toxic and damaging to women and girls, but often we assume it doesn’t harm boys or mens a lick. We think we’re asking them to go against their best interest in the name of fairness or love. But that hatred, that animosity, that fear in little Logan, that isn’t in his best interest. The oppressor is always damaged by believing and treating others as less than fully human. Always. Nobody wins. Everybody loses. 

We humans have a peculiar tendency to assume either/or scenarios despite all logic. Obviously it’s NOT “either men matter OR women do.” It’s NOT “we can give boys books about boys OR books about girls.” It’s NOT “men are important to this industry OR women are.“ 

It’s not either/or. It’s AND.

We can celebrate boys AND girls. We can read about boys AND girls. We can listen to women AND men. We can honor and respect women AND men. And And And. I know this seems obvious and simplistic, but how often have you assumed that a boy reader would only read a book about boys? I have. Have you preselected books for a boy and only offered him books about boys? I’ve done that in the past. And if not, I’ve caught myself and others kind of apologizing about it. “I think you’ll enjoy this book EVEN THOUGH it’s about a girl!” They hear that even though. They know what we mean. And they absorb it as truth.

I met little Logan at the same assembly where I noticed that all the 7th and 8th graders were girls. Later, a teacher told me that the administration only invited the middle school girls to my assembly. Because I’m a woman. I asked, and when they’d had a male author, all the kids were invited. Again reinforcing the falsehood that what men say is universally important but what women say only applies to girls.

One 8th grade boy was a big fan of one of my books and had wanted to come, so the teacher had gotten special permission for him to attend, but by then he was too embarrassed. Ashamed to want to hear a woman speak. Ashamed to care about the thoughts of a girl.

A few days later, I tweeted about how the school didn’t invite the middle school boys. And to my surprise, twitter responded. Twitter was outraged. I was blown away. I’ve been talking about these issues for over a decade, and to be honest, after a while you feel like no one cares. 

But for whatever reason, this time people were ready. I wrote a post explaining what happened, and tens of thousands of people read it. National media outlets interviewed me. People who hadn’t thought about gendered reading before were talking, comparing notes, questioning what had seemed normal. Finally, finally, finally.

And that’s the other thing that stood out to me about Logan—he was so ready to change. Eager for it. So open that he’d started the hour expressing disgust at all things “girly” and ended it by whispering an anxious hope to be a part of that story after all. 

The girls are ready. Boy howdy, we’ve been ready for a painful long time. But the boys, they’re ready too. Are you?

I’ve spoken with many groups about gendered reading in the last few years. Here are some things that I hear:

A librarian, introducing me before my presentation: “Girls, you’re in for a real treat. You’re going to love Shannon Hale’s books. Boys, I expect you to behave anyway.”

A book festival committee member: “Last week we met to choose a keynote speaker for next year. I suggested you, but another member said, ‘What about the boys?’ so we chose a male author instead.”

A parent: “My son read your book and he ACTUALLY liked it!”

A teacher: “I never noticed before, but for read aloud I tend to choose books about boys because I assume those are the only books the boys will like.”

A mom: “My son asked me to read him The Princess in Black, and I said, ‘No, that’s for your sister,’ without even thinking about it.”

A bookseller: “I’ve stopped asking people if they’re shopping for a boy or a girl and instead asking them what kind of story the child likes.”

Like the bookseller, when I do signings, I frequently ask each kid, “What kind of books do you like?” I hear what you’d expect: funny books, adventure stories, fantasy, graphic novels. I’ve never, ever, EVER had a kid say, “I only like books about boys.” Adults are the ones with the weird bias. We’re the ones with the hangups, because we were raised to believe thinking that way is normal. And we pass it along to the kids in sometimes  overt (“Put that back! That’s a girl book!”) but usually in subtle ways we barely notice ourselves.

But we are ready now. We’re ready to notice and to analyze. We’re ready to be thoughtful. We’re ready for change. The girls are ready, the boys are ready, the non-binary kids are ready. The parents, librarians, booksellers, authors, readers are ready. Time’s up. Let’s make a change.